DroneCognitoID.com
Food for thought
Licensed Drivers
Identified Vehicles
Licensed Pilots
Registered Aircraft
Audited Businesses
Licensed Professionals
What about Drones?Drone technology is here to stay.Should accountability evolve with it?
Please view our petition on Change.org
Read & Sign the Petition
| CATEGORY | STATES | US TERR/FD/CW | RATIONALE |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIRECT CIVILIAN SAFETY CONCERN | AR, CA, DE, FL, ID, IN, KS, LA, MI, MS, NJ, NC, OR, PA, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WV, WI | N/A | These jurisdictions have drone-specific laws or amendments tied to one or more of the following: stalking, harassment, voyeurism, Peeping Tom conduct, private-property surveillance, recording through windows, reasonable-expectation-of-privacy spaces, domestic-violence protective orders, or residential intrusion. |
| INDIRECT CONCERN | AK, CO, CT, GA, IL, IA, KY, ME, MD, MT, NV, NH, ND, RI, SC, VT, WY | D.C. | These have drone-related laws, studies, restrictions, warrant rules, public-safety rules, critical-infrastructure rules, hunting/wildlife rules, emergency-response rules, or preemption frameworks — but the law I found so far is not clearly centered on civilian stalking/privacy/voyeurism protection. |
| NO DRONE SPECIFIC STALKING PRIVACY LAWS | AL, AZ, HI, MA, MN, MO, NE, NM, NY, OH, OK, WA | PR, GU, VI, AS, MP | No explicit drone-specific law in these jurisdictions aimed at stalking, harassment, voyeurism, Peeping Tom conduct, or residential privacy. GENERAL stalking, harassment, voyeurism, trespass, nuisance, or invasion-of-privacy laws may still apply. |
Thank you for joining the conversation
We'll keep you informed as this discussion develops.